Evidence-Based Insights
Research Driven Consultancy
Evolved Leadership. Data-Supported Decisions. Future-Focused Insights.

Our research looks at the changing worlds of work, and society
Current Research Focus Areas:
AI & Leadership Integration
- How AI enhances executive decision-making
- The psychology of AI adoption in leadership
- Future workforce implications
ESG & Mental Health Convergence
- Mental wellness as an ESG priority
- Leadership stress and organisational performance
- Sustainable leadership practices
MBTI & Modern Workplace Dynamics
- Personality type effectiveness in hybrid work
- MBTI applications in AI-augmented teams
- Communication optimisation in distributed teams
Governance Evolution
- Board effectiveness in the AI era
- ESG governance best practices
- Director competency requirements
All research directly informs our consulting methodologies, ensuring clients benefit from the latest evidence-based practices.
Human-AI-Organisational Dynamics Research,
July 2025
Project led by: Josephine Matthews and Jo Baker and John Condon
What is your relationship to AI? What are your hopes and fears?
Capacity to Play, Capacity for Governance:
Authority, Anxiety and Artificial Intelligence: Extending Systems-Psychodynamic Analysis of Human-AI Dynamics
Research Overview
Our latest research project explores a striking paradox at the heart of contemporary AI adoption: whilst half of our 640 survey respondents use AI weekly or more frequently, a significant undercurrent of anxiety permeates their relationship with these technologies. Through a systems-psychodynamic lens, we investigate how this tension between engagement and apprehension may be inhibiting what Winnicott termed our "capacity to play" - that crucial transitional space where creativity, learning, and adaptive growth occur.
The study reveals a concerning authority vacuum in AI governance, with only 13% of respondents having received formal AI training despite widespread organisational adoption. This gap suggests what Jung described as "participation mystique" - an unconscious delegation of critical thinking to algorithmic systems, potentially undermining genuine competence development and reflective capacity.
Key Research Findings
Our investigation uncovered four interconnected dynamics that organisations must address to move from what we term "magical thinking" to mindful AI integration:
The Play Paradox: Despite high usage rates, respondents struggle to maintain the exploratory stance necessary for adaptive learning alongside evolving AI capabilities. A quarter of participants anticipate negative impacts from AI, creating defensive rigidity that prevents the curiosity essential for co-evolution with artificial intelligence.
The Authority Vacuum: With 87% of users operating without formal training, organisations risk creating what we observe as "apparatus for thought" delegation - where the anxiety of not understanding AI is managed through over-reliance rather than developing genuine governance capabilities.
The Sustainability Consciousness Gap: Our data reveals a collective splitting defence, where AI is experienced as ethereal and disconnected from material reality. 87% of users engage with AI without any sustainability framework, suggesting an unconscious collusion with techno-solutionism that avoids confronting environmental consequences.
Governance Through Reflection: Only 32% of users operate within any governance framework, indicating a lack of what attachment theory describes as a "secure base" - the contained environment necessary for confident exploration and learning.
Implications for Leadership and Organisational Development
This research directly informs our consulting methodology, highlighting the critical need for organisations to develop what we term "AI-in-the-Mind" - a reflective capacity that balances technical competence with governance accountability whilst maintaining curiosity about evolving capabilities.
Our findings suggest that effective AI integration requires more than technical training; it demands the creation of "transitional AI spaces" where teams can process anxieties through creative engagement rather than defensive avoidance. This approach aligns with our broader consultancy philosophy of integrating psychological insights within business contexts to create sustainable, human-centred solutions.
The research underscores the importance of moving beyond binary thinking about AI adoption towards a more nuanced understanding of how individuals and organisations can develop authentic authority in their relationship with artificial intelligence - neither surrendering critical thinking nor rejecting transformative potential.
This research forms part of our ongoing investigation into Authority, Anxiety and Artificial Intelligence.
Full methodology and detailed findings are available upon request.
We planted a tree for each survey completed - thank you for your participation
Jo Matthews, Jo Baker, John Condon
Here is a summary of our findings:
Blog Series:
Using Myers-Briggs to help implement change, and manage remote/hybrid teams by John Condon
Based on Carl Jung’s Theory of Psychological Types, the MBTI is a self-reported personality survey - respondents answer a series of simple questions about their feelings and preferences, and through discussing and understanding their preferences, we determine their best-fit type, one of 16 personality types. The Covid-19 pandemic brought about a huge shift in our working patterns, and our relationship to the office. Remote work has given many of us a new perspective on how we do our jobs. Without the context of a shared workspace or the rhythm of a typical office day, our own personalities are perhaps having far more of a say in our performance. Leadership in organisations also has to take account of integrating the potential of Ai, and working with Environmental Social and Governmental aspects. To maximise our output in a remote working/hybrid working environment it really helps to better know our personalities—and those of our dispersed colleagues.
Each of these types is identified by four letters, starting with an:
Extraversion (E) or Introversion (I)
Sensing (S) or Intuition (N)
Thinking (T) or Feeling (F)
and Judging (J) or Perceiving (P)
To determine your/your team’s best fit type, we use the online portal questionnaire, then we book a session to review your preferences; we are certified to assess for levels 1 and 2.
Privacy & Legal Notices
For our research projects and in the generation of project data (both qualitative and quantitive), we work to the highest ethical standards. We take personality profiling and the use of psychometric testing very seriously. Everything we do at condon.consulting is in accordance with the Chartered Institute of Personnel & Development’s (CIPD) and British Psychological Society's (BPS) codes of conduct.
Please see our Privacy Notice which outlines how we treat data, and how we hold communication data in line with GDPR compliance.